Saturday, August 22, 2009

17 Again


Mrs Wapiti and I rented "17 Again" from the $1 movie kiosk the other night. We expected another "body swap" movie in the vein of "13 Going on 30" or "Big" and we weren't disappointed in that respect. But while Mrs Wapiti, who is seven years younger than I and who "imprinted" on the current generation of actors and filming styles somewhat enjoyed the movie, I found it completely predictable, a tad boring (largely because of the predictability), not well acted, somewhat irritating, and more than a little bit depressing. I critique this lame movie below.

Basic Plot: The movie starts with the main character, Mike O'Donnell (played by Zac Efron) in high school. He is hip, popular with both the dudes and the bettys, and skilled at athletics. However, just before a crucial basketball game in which a college scout is in attendance, his girlfriend breaks the news to him that she is pregnant before she flees the court. Rather than play the game, O'Donnell abandons his team, thereby blowing his chances for a full-ride scholarship, and proposes to marry his HS girlfriend. Fast-forwarding 20 years, he never went to college, is highly dissatisfied with his soon-to-be-dissolved marriage (more on that later), disappointed about where his career hasn't gone, and has many regrets. He meets his "spirit guide" in the hallways of his old high school (where his two estranged children presently attend), falls off a bridge into a time-warping, body-changin' vortex, and wakes up in his 17 yo body. Subsequently, he determines that his new mission, rather than relive his glory days, is to rescue his son from incipient gamma-male-dom, and his daughter from following her heart* and throwing her lot in with a thug. In the end, he rescues both of his children, convinces his soon-2-b ex that he is worthy of her affection and loyalty, and everyone gets back together and is happy ever after.

Critique #1: The older O'Donnell never graduated from college. He is stalled in a mid-level sales job at a pharma company populated nearly entirely by younger women. He drives a Ford Taurus. He is low-status and drives a prole car. Message: he is a quintessential loser upper-30s beta male, not worthy of respect.

Critique #2: Repeating a meme found in most Disney movies, the feminine is normal in this movie, the male is the one who must change to be worthy of a woman's attention. O'Donnell's soon-2-b ex has no faults, no sins, and is portrayed as being in the right while the O'Donnell character is portrayed as selfish and contemptible and constantly in the wrong. Message: self-explanatory.

Critique #3: Reinforcing Critique #2, this movie normalizes a whole slew of social pathologies wrt men: Feminine contempt for their hardworking self-sacrificing men in their lives (O'Donnell's wife obviously lost respect for him long ago, despite the fact that he sacrificed his future for her and their baby). Wife's toxic friends are portrayed as helpful and not harmful. Wife's self-centered, happiness-seeking therapeutic divorce behavior is positive, even at the expense of the marriage and the welfare of the children. Children's contempt for fathers (no doubt taking cues from mom) is normalized. Women's DV against men is also normalized, and even sort of a joke (Hefron's character is slapped not once, not twice, but 4 times by women and twice more by his effete male best friend).

Critique #4: This movie somewhat normalizes teenage extra-marital sexuality. Abstinence is openly discredited by a HS sex ed teacher. When the O'Donnell character challenges this message in class, he is denigrated as a square and hopelessly clueless. Also, being able to "get a girl" is portrayed as a requisite for being considered a full-fledged male (as depicted by the O'Donnell character coaching gamma-male son to successfully approach and begin to date the captain of the cheer squad). The movie does balance this message however by showing subsequent attempts by the O'Donnell character to evade the simultaneous advances of 3 sexually aggressive, somewhat slutty teenage girls at a party and to counsel his daughter against early sex. These last two examples are shown in a bit more positive light.

Critique #5: This movie conveys the message that selfish behavior is preferable to self-sacrificing behavior in men, by showing O'Donnell being ill-rewarded for putting the concerns of his girlfriend and nascent family above his own. Message: take care of yourself first and everything else will fall into place.

Critique #6: O'Donnell's soon-2-b ex is a cougar, who falls for the younger high-school aged version of O'Donnell. All this while still technically married to the older O'Donnell. Moreover, most of the scenes between the teenage O'Donnell and his older wife are genuinely creepy and inappropriate. Message: it's sort-of okay for a upper 30s woman to have a heavy emotional (the couple doesn't get the chance to take their relationship to the next level) relationship with one of her son's minor friends, and a adulterous one at that. Not much respect for the marital bond here.

All told, this movie was a formulaic body-swap movie that largely reinforces the prevailing cultural memes of "women right, men wrong" and that men need to change to be worthy of a woman's respect. Definite thumbs-down from this viewer.

* I quote Rachel, bride of MikeT, who said: "Telling women to decide on relationships by following their hearts is like telling a man to [decide on relationships by] follow[ing] his penis".

11 comments:

Φ said...

I haven't seen the film, but based on the description you provide, I would offer an alternative understanding of the film's message.

How many countless "Lifetime original movies" have we been subjected to that show divorce as a product of eeeevvviiilll abusive and adulterous men? This movie shows the truth: divorce happens because women get bored.

How many movies show DV as something only men do? This movie shows the truth: women hit at least as much as men, and only do less damage because of their inferior strength.

How many Planned Parenthood spokesdrones have assured us that sex education is value neutral? This movie shows the truth: it isn't.

How many lies did hear from our well-meaning, over-30 mothers that the key to a woman's heart was high contientiousness and agreeableness? This movie shows the truth: those qualities are insufficient, if not actively harmful.

Remember back when Mary Kay LaTourneau was a national sensation? We all thought statutory female rape could never happen. Again, this movie tells the truth, although it's hardly as earth shattering today as it was even ten years ago.

There is a fine line between showing a behavior on screen and normalizing it. I will withhold judgement about which this movie does until I have seen it myself. Until then, I just want to point out that much of what you describe in this movie is the unpleasant reality experienced by many husbands and fathers.

MikeT said...

Unless El Borak and I have entered into a polyandrous relationship without my knowledge, I am married only to my wife Rachel :-P

MikeT said...

On a related note, I think this is the best video ever done on DV. (Warning: link is NSFW and extremely offensive if you are thin-skinned feminazi or mangina).

Elusive Wapiti said...

Oops, sorry Mike! Fixed!

Elusive Wapiti said...

Φ wrote,

"How many movies show DV as something only men do? This movie shows the truth: women hit at least as much as men..."

Ah, but it's not DV. It's...something else, but not DV, which is despicable and hurts people.

Good points though about the alternative interpretations of the movie's messages. Although I still think they normalize the behaviors described to the average Joe more than tell him the alternative truth.

"There is a fine line between showing a behavior on screen and normalizing it."

True, but like qui tacet consentit, simply depicting a behavior on the silver screen in a neutral fashion will have the effect of desensitizing the audience to it and lending a stamp of approval of a sort, thereby contributing to a normalization of the act depicted.

For example, how do women learn that it's okay to beat on men? By seeing it all the time on screen and in their daily lives and no one says anything about it.

Elusive Wapiti said...

Mike, I think I needed to be plowed myself to fully grok that vid.

MikeT said...

The video was meant to make people go nuts that this "guy" was abusing women. In the end, you find out that it was a "hot lesbian."

Whiskey said...

Ah, Prodigy.

Zac Efron is a huge tween idol, so his endorsing abstinence is a big deal for tween girls. Their idol/hero tells them to wait. It's a big deal.

The movie is made for, and appeals to, tween girls. No actual male would see it (Efron is at least widely believed to be gay, regardless of the actuality).

The audience for this movie is 9-12 year old girls. They get the message: divorcing your husband is bad, because he's really Zac Efron inside, don't have sex before 18, and so on.

It's not a bad message. From a guy's standpoint it's the negatives you point out, but no guy will actually see it (Efron himself is laughed as much as the tween girls scream for him).

Elusive Wapiti said...

"No actual male would see it"

I guess this counts me out :)

Whiskey said...

Hey, your wife made you. That's an excuse. But you wouldn't pay for it on your own.

I sat through the Hours once. And it just seemed like that. Because duh, the date of the moment wanted to see it. I was ready to gnaw my arm off to get out of there.

Wonder Woman said...

Follow your nose, it always knows!

Insert "penis" for nose...

I love that in you men ;-)