The Hawaiian Libertarian critiques a case of female supremacist goggles so thick feminists can't see past them to the truth. Which is that women's actions, and that of the feminist-legal-governmental complex they have constructed, greatly magnifies the male sex's vulnerability to suicidal tendencies. Particularly wrt divorce, the primary suicide risk in men, where a man is typically stripped of his only friend, his only consort, his children, his home, most of his stuff, and is required to underwrite it all for a decade or more. So not only do women have better 'support networks'--a fact that I do not dispute, a fact which leads them to treat divorce much more lightly than they should--but their collective sense of entitlement demolish a man's entire world in the process and then get another Man to force him to pay for it. Little wonder to me that some men seek a permanent solution to an admittedly horrible temporary problem.
One thing the femmarxists taught our politicians well is that they can make any rights-demolishing law they want if they say "it's for the children".
Gotta side with the cop on this one. I would do the same. Cop shoots unleashed family dog that was charging him.
Is toxic femininity the chicken to the street harassment egg? The Damed Olde Man thinks so, in an article that explicates how girls sow and reinforces the very behaviors in boys they later decry as adult women.
Speaking of behavior reinforcement, here is LGR's take on books for women that give psychological cover for them to deep-six their own marriages in search of the magic unicorn.
Mark Richardson over at Oz Conservative writes on a major split in the manosphere...that between patriarchal traditionalists, and the male separatists. The former wishes to build a society in which women and men live together in peace according to their innate, God-given roles, the latter seeks independence from the fem-legal-guvmental complex in its entirety.
Came across this DoL report, known as the "Consad Report", that studied the so-called "wage gap". Guess what? It doesn't exist, at least not in favor of men, anyways:
...this study leads to the unambiguous conclusion that the differences in the compensation of men and women are the result of a multitude of factors and that the raw wage gap should not be used as the basis to justify corrective action. Indeed, there may be nothing to correct. The differences in raw wages may be almost entirely the result of the individual choices being made by both male and female workers.Of couse, when one rolls in differences in productivity, this pay gap switches in favor of women, but I've already tilled that ground.
Some MRAs look at the position of men in Islam and fantasize about how nice it would be to be respected like that. FB, no friend of organized religion anyway, throws cold water on that whole proposition.
This is what happens when you let government undercut families, stymie family formation, and encourage family dissolution...eventually, they have to steal from education funds to pay for imprisonment of those lads that hail from the broken homes that government helped create.