Thursday, April 7, 2011

The Key To Longevity

A recent book, reviewed here in the WSJ, claims that longevity appears to be less rooted in IQ or a high-powered degree and more in conscientiousness and your parent's relationship history:
There are no magic potions on offer here, but many of the findings are provocative. The best childhood predictor of longevity, it turns out, is a quality best defined as conscientiousness: "the often complex pattern of persistence, prudence, hard work, close involvement with friends and communities" that produces a well-organized person who is "somewhat obsessive and not at all carefree."
[H]aving a high IQ didn't seem to play a direct role in longevity. Neither did going on to an advanced degree. The authors suggest that persistence and the ability to navigate life's challenges were better predictors of longevity.  Some of the findings in "The Longevity Project" are surprising, others are troubling. Cheerful children, alas, turned out to be shorter-lived than their more sober classmates. The early death of a parent had no measurable effect on children's life spans or mortality risk, but the long-term health effects of broken families were often devastating. Parental divorce during childhood emerged as the single strongest predictor of early death in adulthood. The grown children of divorced parents died almost five years earlier, on average, than children from intact families. The causes of death ranged from accidents and violence to cancer, heart attack and stroke. Parental break-ups remain, the authors say, among the most traumatic and harmful events for children.
While the remainder of the WSJ article proceeds to poke holes in The Longevity Project's thesis, the observations that conscientiousness and whether or not your parent's divorced make intuitive sense.  Consider that conscientiousness drives people to be more detail-oriented about their lives and to be more risk-averse.  Consider also that a parental divorce exposes children to a whole host of adverse consequences, most of which result in some terrible pathologies, such as lower academic achievement, early sexual activity, higher crime rates, lower overall lifetime earnings, and greater exposure to disease.  In other words, family dissolution is akin to throwing a boulder into a lake; it's ripples extend far and wide and affect those closest to the point of impact the most, even those purportedly resilient children.

5 comments:

Professor Hale said...

I would guess it is:

1: Genes. There is no substitute for being genetically superior. Fewer diseases. Fewer deformities. Fewer biological defects all add up to longer lifespans.

2: Take good care of what you have. Eat good food and drink clean water. Avoid diseases, parasites, and toxins. Don't poison your liver and spleen. Avoid high risk occupations and hobbies.

3. To the extent that being from a broken home exacerbates the above, I agree. Otherwise, I see it as such a minor contributor that I wouldn't put any effort into it just for health reasons.

Howard Friedman said...

Genes are important but only about a third of the picture; the rest is how you live and what you do. For more information about The Longevity Project and to read the Introduction (free), go to The Longevity Project
http://www.howardsfriedman.com/longevityproject/

There is also a Facebook page with lots of discussion about The Longevity Project.

Elusive Wapiti said...

"Fewer biological defects all add up to longer lifespans."

I would add that it is also important to take into account the feedback mechanism that environment has on genetics...i.e., an abusive or stressful environment also damages the genetic code, leading to early mortality (and passing the "sins of the father" down to the next generation).

The Pharisee said...

I would have said Grenade instead of boulder in a lake.

Elusive Wapiti said...

Hey Pharisee, welcome back, yes perhaps grenade would be a better word; but then again that comes with imagery of dead fish floating to the top.

On second thought, perhaps that is precisely the imagery we need.