Pages

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Rapist Prevented From Exploiting the Female Sentencing Discount

Idaho mother allegedly rapes two 15-yo adolescent males she met through her 10 yo son. Yawn. Happens all the time, and more and more often these days. What is really noteworthy is that she is being held accountable for her actions:
A mother has been accused of having sex with four underage boys she met through her ten-year-old son. Courtney Sue Reschke, from Idaho, is alleged to have plied the teens--all 15-years-old--with alcohol before having sex with them at her home. The 35-year-old met the teens through her oldest son who is aged ten. She was charged with two counts of felony injury to a child and felony lewd conduct with a child under 16.

Police said the 35-year-old was engaged in a sexual encounter when her five-year-old child tried to get into the bedroom at her home in Kuna, Idaho. Detailing the sex romps that began at the start of the year, Fisher said: 'The five-year-old was attempting to get into the room to get the defendant's attention during one of these encounters and the defendant ignored her.

Reschke, who lists her status as 'single' on her Facebook page, is being held in jail after failing to raise $250,000 bail.

Prosecutors had wanted a bail of $750,000 but were told by Judge Cathleen MacGregor Irby that she would impose a lower limit. MacGregor did tell the mother-of-two that she is to have no contact with any children aged under 18 - including her own children. 'You'll need to make arrangements for your own kids because you won't be allowed to be around them,' MacGregor Irby said.

Reschke's lawyer David Stewart told the court she had lived in the area for seven years and is concerned about losing her job and not being able to take care of her kids if she remains in jail.
While I'm wondering what a 10 yo boy is doing having four 15-yo adult-males-in-training as friends, I find it interesting how ineffective the single mom card was in getting her out of this particular legal jam. Furthermore, while I was completely unsurprised to read that she is unmarried, and was willing to subordinate her children's needs to her own hedonistic self-gratification, I didn't anticipate that the comments to the article would be radically split along sex lines. Commenters with female names condemned her "technical rape" (underage + alcohol-involved) of the boys, while those with male or neuter names rhetorically high-fived the boys' "cougar" experience.

Does this hint at a double-standard in how the sexes view sex? Where women are more normative / idealistic and judge sexual behavior by these ideals, while men are more "realist" in their assessment of the parties involved in this situation?

Hmm.

13 comments:

Unknown said...

This was obviously gross misconduct. She instigated, "seduced" with alcohol, and took advantage. This was ALL her.

The problem with the others is that, yes those teachers are guilty of sexual misconduct and statutory rape, but those boys are anything but innocent. At least some of them are.

They will be seducing their teachers just for bragging rights to their friends - that one Hillsborough teacher in FL sometime in 2004... it was my best friend's cousin that was involved in that. The little snot was the most evil little SOB I've ever met...even before this incident. I knew he seduced her. I knew he was having sex with her for the sole purpose of being able to brag about it to his friends and didn't give a damn if she'd be ruined for it. HE made his cousin drive him around so they could do it in the backseat of his cousin's car.

Yes, she was an idiot. She was a stupid, retarded, slut. But the kid wasn't some innocent bystander that got caught up in her little web of lies.

So when we talk about two consenting individuals having sex, like i said - I have a hard time calling it rape. Same goes when men are the over-aged.

But THIS was rape, pure as day.

Elusive Wapiti said...

Interesting comment, Unknown.

I for one don't put much stock in the notion that sexually mature "children" don't have agency and are therefore completely innocent.

That agency is a sliding scale, a function of maturity. Some mature faster than others, and girls arrive there quicker than boys given that they enter puberty a year or two earlier. Moreover, some youth I know are more mature in their decision making than are adults 10 years their senior.

Thus I have trouble with applying the arbitrary/ideal standard known as the "age of consent" to sexual activity...some kids have it early, some don't, and as you say, some precocious youth take advantage of it.

I think we as a society set ourselves up for failure by having such a large gap between sexual maturity and legal/social recognition of individual agency.

Unknown said...

Thus I have trouble with applying the arbitrary/ideal standard known as the "age of consent" to sexual activity...some kids have it early, some don't, and as you say, some precocious youth take advantage of it.

I think we as a society set ourselves up for failure by having such a large gap between sexual maturity and legal/social recognition of individual agency.


YES! As i was writing the above comment, I was thinking about that very thing. But I also think we give such a late recognition because we're too busy babying our pre-pubescents instead of teaching them what they keep demanding to be treated as - an adult.

Sorry about my handle. Sometimes, I'm logged into my old gmail account to check some old email that comes in through there and sometimes I'm in my new one (with my married handle).

-Christina

ScareCrow said...

A good message to get across to the "high-five" crowd, is that these female pedophiles use the same tactics as the male ones we have all heard about.

They use drugs and/or alcohol to impair the judgement of their victims - to lure them back to their homes...

ray said...

christina --

"The problem with the others is that, yes those teachers are guilty of sexual misconduct and statutory rape, but those boys are anything but innocent."

what hypocrisy

many 15 y.o. girls are absolute hounds for sex, and make availability very clear -- and yes, they will hit up 40 or 50 y.o. men w/o batting an eye

yet if a 35 y.o. man raped them, neither you nor anyone else would call the girls "anything but innocent" . . . instead, all of the feminist West would be labelling them "babies" or "little girls" and demanding 30 years of ass-rape in prison for the terrible criminal, w no bail

that's because women (and their male enablers) don't want justice, fairness, or equity, they want their courts -- criminal, civil, and family -- to continue to function as terroring tools of the western matrirchies

go into ANY courtroom ANYWHERE in amerika and observe the differences in "justice" especially when meted out to men by female "judges" and persecutors

one set of "laws" for me, a whole other set for thee -- oh, and if you object, well that'll soon be a crime too

ptooey on "Womans' Justsis"

wait until this rapist is sentenced, and if she gets 25 or 30 years like a mere male would, then we'll see

Christina said...

Wow Ray - you don't know anything about me and we weren't talking about girls with male teachers, now are we?

We're talking about the differences in sentencing between this woman and the school teachers. My comment was relevant to that.

I don't need to go on a stupid tangent to prove a point. My lack of mention has little to do with what I think on the matter.

El Bastardo said...

The latest Adam Sandler Movie is a prime example of the double standard. For a young male to show his "prowess" at such a young age is bragging rights; and a girl cause for alarm. She could not possibly be sexual with a full grown man could she? Shhhhushhhhhh, the scandal of it all.

Males of our society are raised to recognize their value in utility to others; while females are raised to see their value in the attention they garner.

Similar, yet starkly contrasted philosophies of the sexes. Even though women in their dark make up corners will congratulate a woman on bagging a high alpha man; deep down they hate her for her attractiveness.

Males on the other hand see it differently; the only drawback is that they cannot really talk about it without harming the other; they don't perceive the other as a utility but an experience to be had. Several times if available.

We get painted as dogs; yet the nobility of a dog to come back after being kicked is not recognized in the human male. The female cat like response of packing their bags and leaving after getting what they wanted is viewed as a success.

There is a reason cats and dogs fight. Unless the kitty is a cougar apparently. Maybe it is that motherly instinct that "drives them in?"

I doubt it though, I think males and females are sexual creatures, and we are loathe to admit this; almost as much as we are loathe to admit that there are right, and wrong kinds of it. PC group think will never allow such rationale.

Christina said...

Ray, Go read my first comment in this thread.

Seriously. Stop attacking people.

ray said...

Christina said :

"The problem with the others is that, yes those teachers are guilty of sexual misconduct and statutory rape, but those boys are anything but innocent. At least some of them are."


so, christina, youre asserting that in "the other" general cases of female teachers raping boys, some of the boys are "anything but innocent" -- i.e., they were complicit in being raped, and thus lesser (or no) responsibility accrues to the rapist . . . IF the rapist is FEMALE

of course, assent is no legal defense against statutory rape -- unless one is a FEMALE in the Womans' West . . . then there are endless rationalizations and excuses why one set of "justice" is inflicted upon males, and a complete separate set of "justice" is (rarely) tip-tapped to females


let's change the All Important Genders around, and see how the equality, egalitarianism, and justice work out --

"Yes, those [male] teachers are guilty of sexual misconduct and statutory rape, but those girls are anything but innocent. At least some of them are"


now, i'm an old guy, and i've NEVER heard any western person in a position of authority, nor in mass media, conclude that GIRLS are "anything but innocent" and are thus partly responsible for their statutory rapes

i'm not arguing level of assent or responsibility, b/c Team Woman would just find a way to win that game too

i'm pointing out the hypocrisy and evil of western women and their toady governments and institutions, who assert -- and base their Justsis Sistem -- on constant double-standards, one of which you indulge in above, and then, when called on it, try to back out of, blaming someone else (the nearest male) for YOUR own indefensible statement

gee christina, i've never seen females use THAT tactic beforre! :O)

when i start hearing women in the west, especially in their wholly-owned and controlled Medea, pointing out in cases of statutory rape that GIRLS are often "anything but innocent" then we can BEGIN a discussion

right now, there's no discussion, just endless rationalization by women and their enablers and thugs, supporting their status-quo chokehold over the courts, law, family, government, education, and everything else

you made the statement, you got called on it, and tho you getting mad and Being Offended runs off 99.99 percent of american "men," i've seen all the bullying techniques a zillion times before, and i'm not going anywhere, get used to it, i'll be around a long time

Christina said...

Ray,

I am beyond pissed at you right now, but this isn't my blog and I like EW.

In the other post, I said that I consider 15 year old girls dressed like sluts trying to seduce their teachers for A's are sexual predators.

Care to take back your statement on my being a hypocrite?

Male or female, 15 year olds out to seduce a teacher for their own evil purposes are sexual predators.

ray said...

I am beyond pissed at you right now



who cares?

thats what women have been saying to me for 40 years now:

"That statement Offends me!" (= shut up now or else you get my Sheriffs, my School Authorities, my Homeland Securers, my Sexual Harrassment Charges, etc)

"You sound like a misogynist/loser/gay/etc" (= shut up now or else")

"I feel uncomfortable hearing that" (= shut up now or else")

Or Else means Team Womman's paid lackeys, thugs, officials, creeps, criminals, and assorted other emasculates, doing her dirty work for her when she needs to cover up her own iniquity, deceit, fraud, and selfishness

the Gynogulag's got a GREAT new charge for it: "Gross Verbal Harrassment" . . . basically, it means any time a male points out something true to a female that she doesnt like, or calls her on something she wishes to hide, why, Team Woman and Co. have that "crime" handy to, ah, deal with the Little Lady's Attackers and Offenders

but i'm not afraid of Or Else, i'm just a little past being doggie-led by the emotional tactics of western females, and bullied into more silence

you made the statement, you got called on it, and if you had some Authority (EW or otherwise) to quickly punish me for making you Feel Bad, you and i and aMaryKa and all heaven know your vengeance would already have
been "administered"

(yes, we DO know it, dont we boys, hm?)

fortunately, Your Government and Your Team doesnt control the internet . . . yet

so i still get to Offend, for now

that'll change tho, so take heart, all you lovers of veritas! your great Total Victory is nigh! :O)

have a wonderful day christina, and try to find someone who's worth getting Pissed at . . . there are plenty of worthy candidates very, very, near you, keep looking

heresolong said...

Does anyone really believe that four fifteen year old boys needed to be plied with alcohol in order to be convinced that they should have sex?

ray said...

Does anyone really believe that four fifteen year old boys needed to be plied with alcohol in order to be convinced that they should have sex?


they need to be plied a lot more than your daughters, who require no elixers to stimulate their erotic escapades, but indeed hunt down sexual partners these days with energy and constant variety

[oops wait, i meant the girls EXCEPT your Little Angel Snowflake, who will never seek sex, and never even cogitate it, except blindfolded and sedated on her wedding night, and unwillingly at that!]

the average 15 y.o. girl in amerika is far more sexually experienced -- and sexually predatory -- than the average 15 y.o. boy

there are FAR more adult females raping boys in skools, than adult males raping girls

the beat goes on